Assign an inbox to an agent without sharing your mailbox
Choose a dedicated inbox, preserve its identity and give an agent only the access its workflow needs.
Choose the isolation boundary that matches agent responsibility and customer ownership.
Two workers can share a queue while serving one communication identity, or they can represent different agents with different audiences and policies. Those cases need different designs. A shared support address can work when workers are interchangeable and one durable system assigns each case. Independent purchasing and support agents usually benefit from separate inboxes because their recipients, attachments and review rules differ. Do not use the number of running model processes as the only reason to create addresses. Start with who is accountable for the communication and who may access its context.
A project contains its own inboxes, threads, drafts, domains, webhooks, lists, metrics and API keys. Use separate projects when your application needs a customer or tenant namespace inside one workspace, then bind each worker to its authorized project or inbox. Org-level routes can span projects for an appropriately authorized operator, while scoped keys remain fenced to their resources. Keep project_id in local queue and case records so a thread ID from one tenant cannot be scheduled under another tenant’s credential. Metadata labels alone cannot enforce this isolation.
A separate scoped key lets an operator stop one agent without rotating every worker’s credentials. Store credentials by tenant and agent role in a secret manager, never in a shared model prompt. Before moving a case between agents, preserve provenance and confirm the destination agent has authority to see its source data. Durable production organization moves are unsupported; an organization ID is not a transfer mechanism. Your next step is an ownership table mapping each inbox to its project, responsible workflow, delegated key and human reviewer.
Try one shared support inbox with a single durable case-claim queue, and a second inbox for a distinct workflow that has different recipients. Compare operational clarity rather than raw inbox count. If a worker can read a customer it does not serve, narrow the key scope before adding more model-level routing rules.
Reviewed against checked-in Lupin API handlers and documentation. Example requests were not executed against live providers.
Prepared with AI assistance by Lupin editorial. How we research and maintain these guides.